The final installment of a blog series of 13 sharing art, articles, and abstract ideas that spark a contagious conversation.
This blog series was created as a way to archive the current pandemic and its connection to the climate crisis. We have grown together and learned about what defines a crisis, next was the common ground shared between COVID-19 and climate change. We’ve analyzed the cost-both human and financial – of these crises. We learned about community mutual aid networks and cultural perspectives. This blog series doesn’t stop here, and neither does climate change or the impact of COVID-19.
Here are some of the key take-aways from this 13 blog series:
-A crisis is any event that is going to lead to an unstable and dangerous situation affecting an individual, group, community, or whole society.
-The similarities between how the public has responded to COVID-19 and climate change are striking. “First, one denies the problem, then one denies its severity, and then one says it is too difficult or expensive to fix, and/or that the proposed solution threatens our freedom.” Sound familiar?
-Those who are the most impacted by environmental racism are also those who are hit the hardest from this pandemic.
-GDP, stock markets, and rates of unemployment will be impacted by both the coronavirus and climate change.
-When circumstances change for millions of people and every country all in a short period of time, the social ramifications should be considered just as critical as the economic ones. There is a major social cost to climate change and COVID-19.
-There is a strong link between the countries that have taken quick action against climate change and the countries that have controlled the spread of COVID-19.
As each of these crises continue to evolve and develop, more commonalities and connections can be made. With the information that we gain from COVID-19, we must take action to prepare ourselves better for climate change.
Written by Tatum Eames, Western Washington University Senior and Climate Justice Now Intern.
The twelfth installment of a blog series of 13 sharing art, articles, and abstract ideas that spark a contagious conversation.
Lummi Nation’s first physician from its own community, Dr. Dakotah Lane knows exactly how important culture is when handling crises.
Dr. Lane came back to Lummi Nation in 2016 to practice family medicine after getting his medical degree from Weill Cornell Medicine at Cornell University in New York. It was a switch for him after starting out as an electrical engineer with a degree from the University of Washington (UW) in the Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering (ECE).
He felt called to serve his people.
Protection is what Lummi has been all about as the tribe has taken strong measures that began in February – and they’ve gone further than many governments to protect their people.
“At first in January we were just watching it, and didn’t expect anything,” Lane said. “There was a lot of doubt when we first started, there was a lot of disbelief, ‘Are we overblowing this, are we crying wolf?’ But in February, it became clear to us we need to start acting right now.” The Lummi Nation also has taken steps to bring medical care and support to their community, right to their homes. The tribe purchased iPads and Wi-Fi hot spots, dropped off at patients’ doorsteps for in-home, door-to-door telemedicine. The tribe also has drive-thru testing for anyone who meets the criteria for it. The tribe even set up a medical tent outside, for people who need hands-on examination.
All dental appointments have been canceled, and the dental staff, other than a skeleton crew for emergencies, has been repurposed to help with the virus response, including testing.
The tribe, before the state or federal authorities, called for extreme social distancing. To make sure elders and others have what they need, food is being distributed door to door, and drive-ups to distribution points are available for people still able to leave their homes.
We reached out to Dr. Lane in order to get some more information about Lummi Nation and its fight against crises. His responses are below:
What is the Lummi Nations relationship with health? What are the biggest health concerns facing the Lummi Nation?
The health of the community is very important and our clinic seeks to view the ‘whole’ person which includes the medical, mental, social, and spiritual well-being. Many of our chronic health conditions are the result of poverty which includes obesity, type 2 DM, and substance abuse. Like the rest of the USA, we face a high level of heroin overdose, narcotic abuse, and alcohol abuse.
Our health conditions closely related to multiple socio-economic and environmental factors. Many of our Lummi community members no longer have access to our traditional foods. At family gatherings, my grandparents would always say “when the tide is out, the plate is set”. Much of these shellfisheries continue to have red tide due to runoff from the farms which limit are ability to gather shellfish.
How does the Lummi Nation respond to climate change? What facets of climate change have the most impact on the Lummi Nation?
Climate change has had a huge impact on our way of life. Particularly our ability to traditionally hunt and fish – when I was growing up, I spent my childhood fishing on the banks of Lummi Reservation and throughout the Puget Sound. Today there is limited salmon fishing with decrease fisheries.
How often do you hear issues of climate change discussed within the Lummi Nation? Is it an issue addressed head on, or avoided?
All the time. While I don’t speak for the Lummi Indian Business Council, I do know they are taking climate change seriously. I frequently hear our council advocate for thinking how our decisions today will affect our children tomorrow including designing buildings that are ecofriendly, investing in the education of our children, and fighting for the protection of natural resources (i.e. speaking out against aquafarming).
Do you see any parallels between the COVID-19 pandemic and the looming climate change crisis?
I can make some general observations – the global reliance of fossil fuels impacts the tribes’ ability to depend on our traditional way of life. We seek to protect it by passing on our traditional values, strengthening our culture, and protecting our waterways.
What steps has the Lummi Nation taken to combat climate change? What steps have been taken to combat COVID-19? When were those actions taken?
The Lummi Health Clinic is working to improve the health of the entire community. We have put in place to multiple protective measures for the community including monitoring, testing, and quarantine community members. All of these steps and processes were put in place in early late January (our first order for PPE was Jan 28th).
With regard to climate change, Tribal people have always fought for improved environmental quality – from the early days when they told the Federal government that dams will kill off our salmon (and harm much of our ecosystem) to the present day farmed fish that pollute our waterways.
Is there anything that you wish more communities would do the same as the Lummi nation in addressing the crisis?
Certainly, I wish political leadership would take seriously the necessary changes to protect our waters including the water ways. Salmon is our way of life and the salmon fisheries has strained the entire ecosystem. It starts with protecting the rivers by having thoughtful development that protects the rivers that salmon spawn on for reproduction.
I am grateful to have the opportunity to interview Dr. Lane and share the Lummi culture and their valiant efforts to fight COVID-19 and the climate crisis. This week Lummi Nation’s hereditary chief Bill Tsi’li’xw James passed away and video coverage of his teachings and his service can be viewed here, thanks to Children of the Setting Sun Productions. Taking time to learn from indigenous cultures during this time of learning how to address humanity’s pressing issues may be the just the guidance we need in these uncharted waters.
Written by Tatum Eames, Western Washington University Senior and Climate Justice Now Intern.
The eleventh installment of a blog series of 13 sharing art, articles, and abstract ideas that spark a contagious conversation.
In July 2014, a cell phone video captured some of Eric Garner’s final words as New York City police officers sat on his head and pinned him to the ground on a sidewalk: “I can’t breathe.” On May 25 of this year, the same words were spoken by George Floyd, who pleaded for release as an officer knelt on his neck and pinned him to the ground on a Minneapolis street. As a Black man, he joins a group of countless killed by the police in the United States and a list of each person can be found here. Racism is a crisis. As is climate change, and COVID-19. They all end in the same horrific truth – not being able to breathe.
After news broke about George Floyd’s murder the world erupted in protest. Familiar activists from Black Lives Matter along with White allies showed up in droves, holding signs and wearing face masks to protect from the threat of tear gas and coronavirus in cities such as Minneapolis, New York City, and Seattle. At least 40 cities imposed curfews and National Guard members have been activated in at least 23 states and Washington, DC. In many places the curfews were more strictly enforced than COVID-19 Stay at Home orders.
It is not an accident that all crises disproportionately impact Black people. It is important to remember that our systems are not broken, they were built this way. In the United States, police departments were designed to track people who were enslaved during the Civil War.
The first publicly funded, organized police force with officers on duty full-time was created in Boston in 1838. Boston was a large shipping commercial center, and businesses had been hiring people to protect their property and safeguard the transport of goods from the port of Boston to other places. These merchants came up with a way to save money by transferring to the cost of maintaining a police force to citizens by arguing that it was for the “collective good.”
In the South, however, the economics that drove the creation of police forces were centered not on the protection of shipping interests but on the preservation of the slavery system. Some of the primary policing institutions there were the slave patrols tasked with chasing down runaways and preventing slave revolts; the first formal slave patrol had been created in the Carolina colonies in 1704. During the Civil War, the military became the primary form of law enforcement in the South, but during Reconstruction, many local sheriffs functioned in a way analogous to the earlier slave patrols, enforcing segregation and the disenfranchisement of freed slaves.
Moving forward we must listen to our Black neighbors, friends, and communities. Too many lives are being taken by COVID-19, climate change and racism. The least we can do is take action to protect the most vulnerable.
The tenth installment of a blog series of 13 sharing art, articles, and abstract ideas that spark a contagious conversation.
There have been over 360,000 deaths globally from the coronavirus. The United States has one of the highest death counts at just over 100,000. The next highest death tally? Brazil. The Southern American country has an estimated 2,000 coronavirus cases per million people. The most populated country in the world, India, has confirmed 4,500 deaths from coronavirus. Shouldn’t the places with the most people be contributing to the global death count the most? Why is it that places like the United States and Brazil are being hit so hard by the pandemic while places like Denmark have less than 600 total deaths? Could it be that cultural differences account for these disparities more than healthcare access, GDP, or even local government? This week’s blog posts will be exploring how culture impacts the effects of coronavirus.
Brazil was a colony of Portugal for over three centuries. Brazil inherited a highly traditional and stratified class structure from its colonial period with deep inequality. In recent decades, the emergence of a large middle class has contributed to increase social mobility and alleviated income disparity, but the situation remains grave. Brazil ranks 54th among world countries by Gini index.
Since 2017 the culture in Brazil has shifted. Their politics have slanted more and more to the right, and the United States has become a conservative icon under the Trump administration. This self-described “conservative revolution” some may argue has contributed to some positive changes since new President Bolsonaro took office. These include a greater openness to trade, skepticism of China and reforms that shrank Brazil’s bloated state and made life easier for small businesses. In recent weeks, even as the World Health Organization called South America a “new epicenter” of COVID-19 and the overall death toll in Brazil passed 20,000, Bolsonaro supporters were sharing Twitter memes of anti-social distancing protests in places such as Michigan, and using distinctly American language about “personal liberties” to call for a return to normalcy. Brazilian media have documented how, each time Bolsonaro downplays the virus on TV, social distancing rates slip further. In a country that invests a far lower share of its gross domestic product in health care than the United States, and where people live cheek-by-jowl in places such as Rio de Janeiro, the effect has been disastrous.
In March, India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced one of the strictest lockdowns in the world with hours’ notice at a time when the country had a little over 500 recorded cases. Staying indoors for 21 days would be necessary to “break the chain of infection,” he said, expressing confidence that India would “emerge victorious.” Government officials have highlighted the fact that India’s death toll remains comparatively limited, with about 4,300 deaths recorded so far and a mortality rate of 2.9 percent. In the United States, that figure is 5.9 percent.
In Denmark, culture can be described by these three aspects of Danish life: simplicity, politeness, and equality. Mette Frederiksen, the Prime Minister of Denmark, took office on 27 June 2019. She belongs to a minority government consisting of the Social Democrats. It relies on parliamentary support from the Red–Green Alliance, the Socialist People’s Party, and the Social Liberal Party. This socialist mindset may be connected to the control the country has been able to have on the coronavirus. So far, 83% of people diagnosed with the virus in Denmark have recovered, according to health authorities. Of those who have died, 87% were above the age of 70. Denmark, the first country in Europe to gradually start reopening, reported no coronavirus-related deaths on Friday from the day earlier for the first time since March 13. Denmark’s total number of confirmed cases rose by 78 to 10,791 since Thursday, with the number of hospitalizations falling by 10 to 137. While the amount of deaths is Denmark is proportional to the their population, just like Brazil, the key difference between the two countries is the projected deaths. In Denmark, the death toll remained unchanged at 568. In Brazil, people are expected to die at an increased rate.
Could it be that more conservative, right-wing, capitalist societies are suffering from more coronavirus deaths? Are the individualist cultures contributing to the lack of social support in some countries? Let me know your thoughts in the comments.
The ninth installment of a blog series of 13 sharing art, articles, and abstract ideas that spark a contagious conversation.
Nestled between the Puget Sound and the Canadian boarder lives a quiet town, known for its “subdued excitement” and outdoor lifestyle. Faced with a pandemic, the newly elected city Mayor has been scrambling to protect the health of the city and fulfill his campaign promises. Bellingham, Washington had its first confirmed case of COVID-19 March, 11th 2020. It has followed state orders to shut down all non-essential businesses, and maintain social distancing mandates. The city has also taken an aggressive stance on climate protection. Their ambition is to have greenhouse gas emissions down 100% by the year 2030, as discussed in the 2019 Climate Action Task Force Final Report. Mayor Seth Fleetwood agreed to participate in an email interview for this blog series, highlighting the connections between community, climate, and COVID-19. His responses are below:
Q: Please describe the Bellingham community in 5 words or less.
A great place to live.
Q: How, if at all, has this changed since the COVID-19 pandemic?
It hasn’t changed. It’s still a great place to live.
Q:Is there any cross over in the people who are making decisions about Bellinghams COVID-19 response and the climate crisis response?
Yes. Local government leaders make up the policy making body in charge of the Whatcom Unified Command, the body charged with direct COVID-19 emergency response, and these are the same people who get to develop policy related to how we respond to the climate crisis locally.
Q:What is the biggest impact you see COVID-19 having on the Bellingham community? What about the climate crisis?
It’s making us better, ironically. We are forming deeper relationships and working together more closely than we ever have to solve problems. I am hoping that attitude of improved collaborative problem solving continues after the crisis ends.
That is a huge question with numerous angles and considerations but since you asked me for what I think is the “biggest impact” I will venture an answer. I think the biggest impact will be a future with dramatically increased populations in the Pacific Northwest region as it becomes seen as a comparatively better climate in which to live compared to the Southeast, Midwest and Southwest all of which will get increasingly and unbearably hot. This phenomenon will require us to create a sustainable, socially just future city that accommodates a dramatically larger population. Urban design will be enormously important. As one MIT Design Professor said “the best way to predict the future is to invent it.” If done well it could be very exciting. Save the cities, save the world.
Q: What collective action strategies are the most effective during times of crisis?
Respectful communication.
Q:Why?
Because collective action requires organization and execution and that only happens with agreements that grow out of respectful communication in group dynamics.
Q: Are there any “best practices” that the city of Bellingham follows when navigating a crisis?
Formation of working groups to concentrate on a given problem. We have the capacity to solve all the problems we face when we reach broad agreements on a course of action. It gives me hope.
So, there you have it folks. The city of Bellingham will continue to do what is best for the health and safety of its community. For more information please visit https://www.cob.org/.
Written by Tatum Eames, Western Washington University Senior and Climate Justice Now Intern.
The eighth installment of a blog series of 13 sharing art, articles, and abstract ideas that spark a contagious conversation.
With just a quick Google search, I was able to find 10+ pages of community response teams for COVID-19. Relief funds, medical help, child care, and meal services are just a few of the actions commonly taken by helpers. My question is this: are the communities who are teeming with helpers also the communities that take climate change seriously? Is there a connection between the way neighborhoods, cities, and countries react to COVID-19 and the climate crisis? Where are those communities, and what influences them?
To the left is a map of the world. The blue color is places where cases of COVID-19 have been confirmed. The yellow color is for places where no cases have been found. This map is useful because it helps us understand where the COVID-19 crisis has spread. Most of the world has experienced some turmoil due to COVID-19. There is only one country as of May 2020 without any cases.
This next image reveals the countries where COVID-19 has been found, and tracks its spreading since. The graphs show that countries like US, France, and Spain have had significant growth in COVID-19 cases. Places like Sweden and Canada have limited the spread of the disease. I wondered if the countries where COVID-19 was spreading rapidly might be the same countries that have poor climate protection.
Sweden is ranked as the 4th best country in climate protection. The United States is ranked at 61. This suggests that there may be a correlation between the nations that react quickly to the COVID-19 crisis, follow best practices, and unify communities and their subsequent responses to climate change.
This map depicts the world and color codes countries based on their effort in fighting climate change. Green is used to show a very high level of effort and help, while red is used to show a very low effort. Again we can see some intersections in the communities that have responded adequately to the COVID-19 pandemic, and those who have taken action of climate protection.
Where we live matters. Our communities and their reactions to crisis can be the defining factor in thriving or suffering. In some ways, the COVID-19 pandemic is a trial run, a foreshadowing of future events, and a glimpse of what reactions to a worsening climate crisis could be. Let’s all make our communities the ones who fight.
Written by Tatum Eames, Western Washington University Senior and Climate Justice Now Intern.
The seventh installment of a blog series of 13 sharing art, articles, and abstract ideas that spark a contagious conversation.
The economic hit caused by COVID-19 and the climate crisis is clear, but the social implications can be just as devastating. When circumstances change for millions of people and every country all in a short period of time, the social ramifications should be considered just as critical as the economic ones.
Income itself, of course, is strongly associated with poorer health across the income distribution, whether measured by life expectancy, health status or infant mortality. The gap in life expectancy between the richest and poorest 1 percent of individuals in the U.S. is around 14 years, a gap that, unlike in other high income countries, has continued to grow in recent years. These are just a few of the non-economic crises taking place in response to COVID-19.
And then there is the environmental crisis. The social cost of climate change was actually calculated. It’s a policy tool that attaches a price tag to the long-term economic damage caused by one ton of carbon dioxide, hence the cost to society. It’s related to a carbon tax, and it serves as a way to distill the vast global consequences of climate change down to a practical metric. Suppose every country in the world suddenly wakes up tomorrow in ecstatic cahoots on climate change and decides to implement a carbon tax at the level of their respective social costs of carbon. Will that solve climate change?
Not even remotely.
That’s because there are some countries that emit very little and will be hit hard by climate change, while others emit a lot and won’t see as many damages. So for a country to set a meaningful carbon tax, or any other price on carbon, it has to include damages caused to other countries, as former Obama adviser Jason Bordoff wrote in the Wall Street Journal:
“Unlike other regulated pollutants that have almost entirely domestic consequences, CO2 impacts are global, and climate change is a “tragedy of the commons” problem. A ton of CO2 contributes equally to climate change regardless of where it comes from. If all nations looked only at the impact of a ton of CO2 on their own nations, the collective response would be vastly inadequate to address the true damages from climate change.”
This is part of why the global social cost of carbon, $417 per ton, is so much higher than it is for any individual country. The costs of climate change are greater than the sum of their parts. Yet it also shows that many of the wealthiest countries, which contributed the most greenhouse gases, stand to be the best insulated from its costs.
That makes climate change a global justice concern. In limiting global warming, wealthy countries face a moral imperative to look beyond their borders and GDPs, pushing even harder to cut their own emissions. The social costs of carbon also show why climate change really has to be tackled as a global problem rather than by individual nations.
Written by Tatum Eames, Western Washington University Senior and Climate Justice Now Intern.
The sixth installment of a blog series of 13 sharing art, articles, and abstract ideas that spark a contagious conversation.
Many predictions of the economic and social costs of our current pandemic are based on the effects of the influenza pandemic of 1918. The influenza pandemic in the United States occurred in three waves during 1918 and 1919. The first wave began in March 1918 and lasted throughout the summer of 1918. The more devastating second and third waves (the second being the worst) occurred in the fall of 1918 and the spring of 1919. Although it originated in the U.S., according to one researcher:
“Spanish influenza moved across the United States in the same way as the pioneers had, for it followed their trails which had become railroads…the pandemic started along the axis from Massachusetts to Virginia…leaped the Appalachians…positioned along the inland waterways…it jumped clear across the plains and the Rockies to Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Seattle. Then, with secure bases on both coasts…took its time to seep into every niche and corner of America.”
As COVID-19 seeps into every niche and corner of modern America, the question of cost is on all of our minds. What will this pandemic cost us? Will the unemployment rate ever jump back to normal? How can the stock market come back from this? The Bureau for Labor Statistics’ April 2020 job report reveals that the unemployment rate is currently 14.7%. The jump from March 2020’s 10.3% rate to April’s rate is the highest unemployment rate month-to-month increase since reporting started in 1948.
The George Mason Univeristy Mercatus Center reseachers estimate that the real GDP growth rate will decline 5 percent for each month of partial economic shutdown. Therefore, the economic cost of the first two months spent fighting the pandemic will be $2.14 trillion (10 percent), which is surprisingly close to the static fiscal cost of the CARES Act.
At a time when there’s concern about a global economic downturn, a study from August 2019 circulated as a working paper in the National Bureau of Economic Research, warns of a far bigger cut to economic growth if global warming goes unchecked. The Washington Post wrote an article titled,”Climate change could cost the U.S. up to 10.5 percent of its GDP by 2100, study finds” that nearly broke the comments section.
“What our study suggests is that climate change is costly for all countries under the business as usual scenario (no matter whether they are hot or cold, rich or poor), and the United States will be one of the countries that will suffer the most (reflecting sharp increases in U.S. average temperatures by 2100),” study co-author Kamiar Mohaddes, an economist at the University of Cambridge reports.
Extreme weather events, cuts to worker productivity and other effects of climate change could cause major global economic losses unless greenhouse gas emissions are significantly curtailed in the next few decades. Climate change constitutes a looming financial risk, even in the midst of COVID-19 chaos.
Written by Tatum Eames, Western Washington University Senior and Climate Justice Now Intern.
The fifth installment of a blog series of 13 sharing art, articles, and abstract ideas that spark a contagious conversation.
This week we have been analyzing the common ground between COVID-19 and the climate crisis. There are many, many parallels between the two situations, but this post is going to dive deeply into perhaps one of the most catastrophic similarities: the communities most impacted.
It is no secret that minority communities tend to have less access to fresh food, safe water sources, clean living environments, libraries, and other social goods. It is also no secret that minority communities tend to have more challenges with health. These are connected phenomenons – and the evidence has become ever clearer during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released preliminary data on coronavirus cases broken down by race and ethnicity as provided by state health departments. But 78 percent of the data were missing details on race and ethnicity as of April 15, the report said. “In small metro areas as well as rural areas, we’re seeing disproportionately higher COVID-19 deaths taking place in primarily black counties,” said Gregorio Millett, a lead investigator on the study and amFar vice president. The study also found that the disproportionately black counties ravaged by coronavirus cases and deaths showed high levels of underlying conditions like heart disease, hypertension and diabetes.
The EPA’s National Center for Environmental Assessment released a study indicating that people of color are much more likely to live near polluters and breathe polluted air. Specifically, the study finds that people in poverty are exposed to more fine particulate matter than people living above poverty. According to the study’s authors, “results at national, state, and county scales all indicate that non-whites tend to be burdened disproportionately to Whites.”
Particulate matter was named a known definite carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, and it’s been named by the EPA as a contributor to several lung conditions, heart attacks, and possible premature deaths. The pollutant has been implicated in both asthma prevalence and severity, low birth weights, and high blood pressure.
As the study details, previous works have also linked disproportionate exposure to particulate matter and America’s racial geography. A 2016 study in Environment Internationalfound that long-term exposure to the pollutant is associated with racial segregation, with more highly segregated areas suffering higher levels of exposure. A 2012 article in Environmental Health Perspectives found that overall levels of particulate matter exposure for people of color were higher than those for white people. That article also provided a breakdown of just what kinds of particulate matter counts in the exposures. It found that while differences in overall particulate matter by race were significant, differences for some key particles were immense. For example, Hispanics faced rates of chlorine exposure that are more than double those of whites. Chronic chlorine inhalation is known for degrading cardiac function.
The links between health and environment are strong. When it comes to seeing the common ground connecting the coronavirus to our climate crisis, this becomes abundantly clear.
Written by Tatum Eames, Western Washington University Senior and Climate Justice Now Intern.
The forth installment of a blog series sharing art, articles, and abstract ideas that spark a contagious conversation.
These days every headline we see is about the latest coronavirus statistics, the government responses, and the newest hot spots. It seems random, arbitrary, and impossible to track the path of this thing. But what if our environmental conditions have left some populations more vulnerable to the virus than others? What if the destruction caused by COVID-19 is foreshadowing the destruction yet to come? In this blog, we’ll be discussing the common ground between this current pandemic and the climate crisis. Prepare for some eerie parallels.
WIRED contributor Gilad Eleman’s article titled, “The Analogy Between Covid-19 and Climate Change Is Eerily Precise” is the first post that comes up when you Google search the connection between climate change and COVID-19. He writes that the public response to our current pandemic is simply a time-lapsed version of the public’s response to climate change.
“We went through the stages of climate change denial in the matter of a week,” said Gordon Pennycook, a psychologist at the University of Regina in Saskatchewan, Canada, who studies how misinformation spreads. Naomi Oreskes, a historian of science who has studied the origins of climate disinformation, spelled out the pattern in an email: “First, one denies the problem, then one denies its severity, and then one says it is too difficult or expensive to fix, and/or that the proposed solution threatens our freedom.” Sound familiar?
Now we’re faced with the threat of another global catastrophe arising from the clash of nature and modern human activity. As with climate change, the implications of the COVID-19 pandemic are difficult to predict with confidence. As with climate change, the uncertainty interval encompasses utter cataclysm. As with climate change, any serious effort to mitigate or stave off this disaster will require major economic disruptions. And, as with climate change, such efforts to save the world must be put in place before any of the experts’ doomsday warnings could ever be proved true.
Gilead Eleman’s WIRED article concludes with this: “The climate change issue has been transformed into a badge of who people think they are,” said Roger Pielke Jr., a political scientist and environmental studies professor at the University of Colorado at Boulder. “So if you’re a good card-carrying Republican in the Midwest, then you’d better be against that climate change stuff. And if you’re a West Coast liberal, or you live in Boulder, like me, of course you support fighting climate change.” When scientific questions become political issues, he added, people’s beliefs become statements of identity. “To some extent we see that with the coronavirus.”
The common ground between these two issues is more extensive than most assume. By the time people are ready to take radical change, it will be too late. The economic costs are too severe to endure. Identity politics are getting in the way of scientic facts.
Did I miss anything? Let me know in the comments of you see more common ground between COVID-19 and the climate crisis.
Written by Tatum Eames, Western Washington University Senior and Climate Justice Now Intern.